Sedulius Scotus, Collectaneum in Mattheum (5:34)
Written c. 850 CE, by Irish monk, Sedulius Scotus. The commentary
on the passage (Matt. 5:33-37) is largely a compilation and reworking of
Patristic material. Sedulius opens (v. 33) with Jerome followed by Augustine.
He uses Augustine for the main body of the passage (v. 34-36), and ends (v. 37)
with Hilary followed by Augustine. In the conclusion to v. 34a ("Do not
swear at all") Sedulius offers a small independent contribution within a re-purposed Augustinian argument on the use of a necessary oath, wherein he
argues that "omnino" should be understood as "assidue"
(continually; frequently; incessantly). This likely an allusion to Sir. 23:7-11
(Vulg).
Source: Bengt
Löfstedt, ed. 1989. Sedulius Scottus: Kommentar Zum Evangelium Nach Matthäus Vol.
1 (1,1 - 11,1), p. 171. Verlag Herder. [Translation mine].
Therefore the Lord does not prohibit swearing if necessity demands
it, as with the Apostle; he forbids to swear "omnino," that is
continually ('assidue'), so that we do not fall into perjury by custom of
swearing. Swearing then, should not be
understood as a good, but as something necessary. Refrain from it as much as
you can, using only when needed, when men are slow to trust without an oath.
-
Non ergo nos Dominus vetat iurare, si necessitas poposcerit, ut
Apostolus iurauit, sed "omnino," hoc est 'assidue,' iurare prohibet,
ne per consuetudinem iurandi in periurium incidamus. Quapropter qui intelligit
non in bonus, sed in necessariis iurationem habendam, refrenet se quantum
potest, ut non ea utatur nisi in necessitate, cum uiderit pigros esse homines
ed credendum, nisi iuratione firmentur.
No comments:
Post a Comment